These technologies fail because they rely on binary messaging.
Microsoft originally developed SOAP to take the place of older technologies that don’t work well on the internet such as the Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM) and Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA). SOAP relies exclusively on XML to provide messaging services. Both SOAP and REST rely on well-established rules that everyone has agreed to abide by in the interest of exchanging information. REST as an architecture style does not require processing and is naturally more flexible. The rules in SOAP are important because we can’t achieve any level of standardization without them.
While SOAP and REST share similarities over the HTTP protocol, SOAP is a more rigid set of messaging patterns than REST. But it’s still not as standardized as REST and SOAP, so in this article we’re just going to focus on those two.īoth SOAP and REST have issues to consider when deciding which protocol to use. Of course, GraphQL has recently made a huge splash, which we’ve spoken of at length in other articles. It seeks to fix the problems with SOAP and provide a simpler method of accessing web services. REST (Representational State Transfer) is another standard, made in response to SOAP’s shortcomings. Originally developed by Microsoft, SOAP isn’t as simple as the acronym would suggest. SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) is a standards-based web services access protocol that has been around for a long time.
SOAP VS REST HOW TO
And really, they’re just two answers to the same question: how to access web services.īut deciding one over the other can be surprisingly difficult.
0 kommentar(er)
